I Giorgio Agamben fries an egg I (D6), installation, 2015
I Giorgio Agamben fries an egg I (a pawn and a queen) , documentation of the performative journey, 2017
Breakfast that comes, video, 2015
I Giorgio Agamben fries an egg I (D6), installation, 2015
I Giorgio Agamben fries an egg I (a pawn and a queen) , documentation of the performative journey, 2017
Breakfast that comes, video, 2015
Piece For Resistance. Other's Dialogue on Revolution, site-specific performatif dispositif, Moscow, 2014
Piece For Resistance. Other's Dialogue on Revolution, site-specific performatif dispositif, Moscow, 2014
Visitors of an exhibition space are suggested to 'do nothing'
2021
performance
exhibition 'In the Long Blink of an Eye', HISK -Gosset site, Brussels, curated by Daniella Géo
Images by the artist
Visitors of an exhibition space are suggested to 'do nothing'
2021
performance
exhibition 'In the Long Blink of an Eye', HISK -Gosset site, Brussels, curated by Daniella Géo
Images by the artist
Ekaterina Vasilyeva artiste
Katya Ev
(ekaterina vasilyeva)
(Le Plus objet des objets)
infiltrated performance
2019
This mise-en-scene puts into center the experience of the viewer, physical, emotional and intellectual, while revealing the most controversy but totally common characteristics of an institution - being opaque (no reasons or explanations are given, “the institution has decided” ), being arbitrary (not treating people equally ), and playing on the hidden agenda. Thus, the project falls within the tradition of the institutional critique but questions more broadly the ambiguities between freedom and control. By deliberately creating to the viewer the feeling of physical sideration or being mentally stuck pushed toits utmost, in the end of the day, the whole situation operates as a means of personal liberation and encourages a critical distance and questioning the notion of a restriction and more generally all power structures.
« Revisiting various legacies and histories of institutional critique, the performance (Le plus objet des objets) addresses museum’s generic codes of conduct and its standard disciplinary rules. Art institutions and their legitimizing function are certainly of concern here, as well as an intention to undermine the assumption that museums offer neutral viewing conditions: museums, as we know, are ideological constructs. Most importantly, however, performativity of the museum’s disciplinary apparatus is explored in this piece. The language of the guards and the movements of the spectators constitute an integral part of museums power-knowledge (Foucault) established through a relationship between saying and seeing ». Elena Sorokina